The scarcest thing on your team is senior attention#
A four hundred line pull request does not need four hundred lines of senior review. It needs someone experienced to look hard at about nine of them. The problem is that finding those nine costs the same as reading all four hundred, so the reviews that matter most are the ones that sit longest in the queue.
Every team solves this the same way, badly: the senior skims, approves, and hopes the important change was not in the part they skimmed.
Every pull request arrives ranked#
The review agent reads the diff before you do and turns it into an ordered overview rather than a flat list. Each finding carries a severity and the file it lives in, so the shape of the review is visible in seconds:
- High - the null dereference when a session expires
- Medium - the webhook payload accepted without validation
- Low - the unused export in a helper
Routine noise is pushed down rather than deleted, and the full diff stays one click away. You are not being asked to trust a summary. You are being told where to spend the first five minutes.
A finding is a starting point#
Most review tools hand you a list of problems and wish you luck. Here a finding is something you can act on directly: hand it to a sandbox agent and the fix comes back as its own pull request, grounded in the same context the reviewer used. The work of writing the fix moves off the senior’s desk without the judgement moving with it.
Nothing merges itself#
The review posts to the pull request like any other reviewer. Approval stays human, the gate stays where your team put it, and the agent’s job ends at telling you what deserves attention.
Start free#
Put your next big pull request through it. 60 days free, no credit card required.